Lead UX Designer Platform Initiative 2025, ongoing

From analyst-dependent
to customer-owned.

A platform-level UX initiative for Contify's market intelligence product, covering improvements across the app and starting with onboarding. During discovery, it became a strategic shift in how the entire platform relates to its users.

Trial setup
1 wk
analyst-led
<2 hrs
self-serve, day one
Analyst load
2 days
per prospect
Lower CAC
freed for live users
Role
Lead UX Designer
Team
+2 designers
Year
2025, ongoing
About
What is Contify?

The brief was platform UX.
The insight was ownership.

Contify wanted broad UX improvements, starting with onboarding. During discovery, a pattern emerged that reframed the entire initiative: customers depended on analysts not just to get started, but throughout their journey. The product was complex enough that using it without analyst support was impractical, so the platform had effectively been built around the assumption that an analyst would always be nearby.

The goal shifted. Not to redesign a flow, but to move the platform toward genuine customer ownership so users could configure, understand, and manage their intelligence programs on their own.

I proposed this reframe to leadership. The CEO and leadership team responded positively and the initiative was scoped accordingly.

Led the initiative.
Designed the hardest part.

I led UX strategy across the full initiative and managed the design of adjacent areas like navigation, dashboards, and outputs, working with one designer at a time. The onboarding strategy and design was mine end to end.

Driving the strategy while staying hands-on with the most complex part kept the decisions grounded. Designing the actual onboarding flow kept the ownership idea honest, because it had to work as a real screen, not just a direction on a slide.

From 1 week
to under 2 hours.

The old process averaged about a week before a customer could start: an analyst meeting, scoping, internal configuration, and a demo. The trial clock only started after all of that, so getting going was slow and entirely analyst-led. Self-serve setup brings it down to under two hours.

Before
After
Analyst sets up the account
Customer sets up their own trial
About 1 week to trial start
Ready in under 2 hours
2 days of analyst time per prospect
Analyst time freed for live users
Passive customer, observes a demo
Active customer, owns the setup
Trial starts a week in
Up to 2x more usable trial time

The setup wizard moves through three steps: define the monitoring scope (companies, competitors, and topics), organize the intelligence into tags and taxonomy, and add teams and users. Sources attach to companies and topics, so users can set them during onboarding or come back to them later.

The flow leans on AI to do most of the heavy lifting. Inputs are extracted automatically from a document the user provides, and tags are created from what they enter in the first step. Most of the user's job is reviewing what has been populated and adjusting or adding where needed, rather than building everything from a blank screen.

Set Up Your Market Intelligence — initial setup screen
Intelligence Setup: companies and topics are extracted from an uploaded document, ready to review and adjust.

Tested with analysts, sales teams, and real end users. They found the new setup easier to understand and quicker to move through than the old process.

Company setup step
Step 1: Define Monitoring Scope — companies and topics extracted from document, ready to review.
Taxonomy and tags step
Step 2: Organize Intelligence — tag structure built from monitoring scope inputs.

The same ownership principle is moving into the rest of the platform: navigation, dashboards, and rule-building. Rule-writing is the clearest example. It was painful enough that even analysts struggled with it, which made it impossible for most customers. The redesign simplifies it to the point where users can write their own rules, removing one of the last places they had to depend on an analyst.

Validated by users,
analysts, and leadership.

Users
Easier to use. Double the trial time.
Found onboarding simpler to navigate. With setup down to 2 hours, users now get the full two-week trial from day one rather than day seven.
Analysts
Freed for the work that needs them.
Responded positively to the direction. The goal was never to replace analysts but to stop using their time on setup that customers could do themselves.
Leadership
A lens for the whole platform.
Leadership responded positively to the reframe. The ownership framing gave a set of separate UX efforts a single, clear direction to organise around.
Business
More trials. Lower cost per user.
Analyst capacity redirected from trial setup to supporting converted users. Each analyst can now support more customers at the same time. Lower CAC.
Keerthana broke the problem into clear sub-problems, challenged long-held assumptions, and engaged users directly through multiple customer interviews. I was impressed by the clarity of thinking and the ability to articulate the problem and define a methodology to solve it.
Mohit Bhakuni
CEO, Contify
More work